Search Results

No Search Results Found

Search Results

No Search Results Found

Explore HomeNewsPodcastsBreaking NewsSocial Watch Live Infowars NetworkThe Alex Jones ShowThe War Room with Owen ShroyerThe American Journal More Banned.VideoInfowars StoreArchiveRSSDownload Our App

Terms of Service


Advertise with us


Media Inquiries



Dems Control Supreme Court With Simple Threat of ‘Packing’

by Kit Daniels
April 27th 2021, 12:52 pm
The threat of "court packing," combined with the already tepid "conservatism" of several justices, doesn't bode well
Image Credit:
James Leynse / Getty
Fund the InfoWar. Donate Now!
Keep up to date with our latest:
Sign Up Now
Have an important tip? Let us know.Email us here.

Democrats won’t need to ‘pack’ the Supreme Court if they can use the threat of it to influence upcoming decisions.

This is especially true given that Trump’s Supreme Court picks, along with the Bush-appointed John Roberts, are not as conservative as expected.

Democrats have proposed ‘packing’ the court by expanding the number of justices from nine to 13.

“Biden’s [court packing] commission, and the continued saber-rattling about drastically ‘reforming’ the judiciary, aims to strengthen her position, as Roberts and — the left hopes — Kavanaugh become increasingly cautious,” reported The Hill. “The Biden court-packing commission won’t alter the Supreme Court, but the progressive court-packing diatribes could tame the court’s conservative majority.”

Not surprisingly, conservatives aren’t enthusiastic about this possibility as the Supreme Court just made the rare decision – with strange timing – to hear a Second Amendment case.

The case challenges a New York gun law which prohibit citizens from carrying handguns concealed outside their homes for general self-defense protections without a declared “special circumstance” deemed valid by the state.

In short, the case challenges the “may issue” stance of certain states that “may” grant a concealed handgun permit to those the state deems worthy of protection.

Most other states, in contrast, don’t require citizens to show an extraordinary need to carry a handgun concealed.

The rarity and timing of the Supreme Court’s decision to hear the case is noteworthy because, for its entire existence, the Court has generally avoided hearing Second Amendment cases.

The threat of “court packing,” combined with the already tepid “conservatism” of several justices, doesn’t bode well for the Second Amendment or other future cases with historic implications.

In case you missed it...


Prince Harry’s Attack On The First Amendment Is An Attack on America Itself

posted 13 hours ago


If Medically Assisted Procreation Is A Legal Reality For French Women, Child Support From Men Must Be Scrapped

posted 16 hours ago


Woke Mob Increasingly Desperate As “Vaccine Hesitancy” Surges

posted 2 days ago


DHS to scan social media posts looking for “domestic terrorists” after Capitol breach

posted 3 days ago

View More From Opinions
Terms of ServiceDMCAAdvertise with usAffiliatesMedia InquiriesAbout